<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sickdesigner.com &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/category/photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sickdesigner.com</link>
	<description>The work &#38; play of Radu Chelariu</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 16:22:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>6 tips to improve P&amp;S photography</title>
		<link>http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/2009/photography/6-tips-to-improve-ps-photography/</link>
		<comments>http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/2009/photography/6-tips-to-improve-ps-photography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Radu Chelariu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amateur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iso]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photgraphy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point-and-shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sickdesigner.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many, if not all, of us have at least one point &#38; shoot camera. They&#8217;re great for carrying with you basically anywhere because they&#8217;re small, light and easy to use. Their biggest disadvantage is the&#8230; poor to awful quality of the photos taken with them. Small sensors, mediocre lenses and noise worse than a Pig [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many, if not all, of us have at least one point &amp; shoot camera. They&#8217;re great for carrying with you basically anywhere because they&#8217;re small, light and easy to use. Their biggest disadvantage is the&#8230; <span id="more-362"></span> poor to awful quality of the photos taken with them. Small sensors, mediocre lenses and noise worse than a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ukYkC7Ek-0">Pig Destroyer</a> concert are what characterize a point-and-shoot camera technologically speaking.</p>
<p>Advances in recent years have managed to allow for better point-and-shoots, quality wise, but still nowhere near comparable with even the low end DSLRs. The only disadvantages to a DSLR are their increased weight and size and, of course, the price. Sure, if you want to take photography to the next level you&#8217;re going to want to save some money and buy a DSLR but what if you just want to take photos of your family and maybe some nice textures to use in your designs? Does a DSLR&#8217;s quality justify the price if all you want is to take perpendicular shots of bark?</p>
<p>Maybe not. And this what this post is going to try to help out with: getting away with it and saving a pretty buck in the process.  I am assuming you have a camera. Oh, and if you&#8217;ve spent more than 400$ on it, than I regretfully have to inform you that you&#8217;d have been better off with one of <a href="http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d40/index.htm" target="_blank">these</a>.</p>
<p>These tips are guaranteed to help you take the best possible pictures with your point-and-shoot camera. Alright cheapos, let&#8217;s get this puppy going:<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-366" title="point-and-shoot-improving-01" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/point-and-shoot-improving-01.jpg" alt="point-and-shoot-improving-01" width="558" height="200" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">01</span></pre>
<p>Never, ever, I mean n-e-v-e-r take night shots. P&amp;S have really, really bad responses to light. Their sensors are very small [5 times smaller than a full frame sensor] and thus they distribute light inefficiently and in a night shot, where light is [duh!] scarce you&#8217;re gonna end up with a noisy, unrealistically lit photo. This is a big no-no.<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-368" title="point-and-shoot-improving-02" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/point-and-shoot-improving-02.jpg" alt="point-and-shoot-improving-02" width="558" height="200" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">02</span></pre>
<p>As much as possible [to be read never] try not to use the flash. Turn on another light or get a lamp if you&#8217;re in a room and you need extra light but don&#8217;t turn that flash on. It spreads light unevenly, it creates the red eye effect and a kitty dies of sadness if you do. Just kidding about the kitty. Or<a href="http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/funny-pictures-kitten-is-it-dead.jpg" target="_blank"> am</a> I?<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-369" title="point-and-shoot-improving-03" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/point-and-shoot-improving-03.jpg" alt="point-and-shoot-improving-03" width="558" height="200" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">03</span></pre>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t touch that ISO! With a P&amp;S any setting above 200 is going to give you serious noise.</p></blockquote>
<p>Don&#8217;t touch that ISO! Seriously, when you first buy that blasted P&amp;S turn it on, go to the ISO setting and if possible password code the ISO setting to it&#8217;s smallest possible value, usually 100. If you own a DSLR you&#8217;re probably going: &#8220;what? I play with my ISO settings all the time and the pics look just as good&#8221;. Yeah, with a DSLR. With a P&amp;S any setting above 200 is going to give you serious noise. Go ahead, experiment. Take a picture with the ISO at it&#8217;s highest, usually 1600. Then check that out. No amount of Noise Reduction is going to solve that. So, again, do us all a favor: Don&#8217;t touch that ISO!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-370" title="point-and-shoot-improving-04" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/point-and-shoot-improving-04.jpg" alt="point-and-shoot-improving-04" width="558" height="200" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">04</span></pre>
<p>Try to take more pictures between 06:00 &#8211; 17:00 than 17:00 &#8211; 20:00. What&#8217;s that? No, I&#8217;m not nuts. Here&#8217;s why: because P&amp;S have crappy sensors, you have to get as much light in there as possible. I found that light falls best for my camera between 10:00 and 14:00. That&#8217;s when I get the best possible pictures. But mornings are generally best. And no, sunsets are not ok. Light is scarce then, unlike mornings and you&#8217;re going to lose details and get loads of noise or really dark pics.<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-371" title="point-and-shoot-improving-05" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/point-and-shoot-improving-05.jpg" alt="point-and-shoot-improving-05" width="558" height="200" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">05</span></pre>
<p>Work with your Exposure settings a lot. It&#8217;s the safest way to have control over how lit your picture is. And no, a Levels Adjustment in your preferred software after the picture has been taken is NOT the same thing.<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-372" title="point-and-shoot-improving-06" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/point-and-shoot-improving-06.jpg" alt="point-and-shoot-improving-06" width="558" height="200" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">06</span></pre>
<p>If you just can&#8217;t get enough light to get a good pic, don&#8217;t fret. All&#8217;s not lost. Set your Exposure Time to whatever you need it to be, depending on the situation. Most P&amp;S have a Drive Mode, otherwise known as a timer. Set your timer to something like 10 seconds and rest the camera on something flat so there&#8217;s nothing to move it. Usually the motion stabilizer in P&amp;S is pretty shotty, to say the least, so don&#8217;t count on that to get rid of any motion blur.</p>
<p>All of these tips deal with in-camera settings, but for those of you that have a DIY thumb, the web has a few very good articles on doing your own price conscious paraphernalia:</p>
<p><a href="http://digital-photography-school.com/diy-flash-and-lighting-hacks-for-digital-photographers" target="_blank">DPS: DIY Lighting Hacks for Digital Photographers</a></p>
<p><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5108706/top-10-diy-photography-tools" target="_blank">Lifehacker: Top 10 DIY Photography Tools</a></p>
<p><em class="end">Hope these tips help out with your future pictures and maybe get you to be more interested in photography, if you aren&#8217;t already. Until next time, my unsuspecting interwebbies, until next time!</em></p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 763px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden;">Don&#8217;t touch that ISO!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/2009/photography/6-tips-to-improve-ps-photography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor man&#8217;s photo enhancement</title>
		<link>http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/2009/photography/poor-mans-photo-enhancement/</link>
		<comments>http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/2009/photography/poor-mans-photo-enhancement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Radu Chelariu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amateur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceahlau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enchancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point-and-shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shadows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sickdesigner.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey there everyone, I&#8217;m back with another sick tutorial. Today we&#8217;ll be talking about improving amateur pictures taken with a regular point-and-shoot camera. We&#8217;ll go over things like camera sensors and light, blur, focus and colors and how to deal with all these issues effectively. So click the pic and read on. I&#8217;ve seen a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there everyone, I&#8217;m back with another sick tutorial. Today we&#8217;ll be talking about improving amateur pictures taken with a regular point-and-shoot camera. <span id="more-341"></span> We&#8217;ll go over things like camera sensors and light, blur, focus and colors and how to deal with all these issues effectively. So click the pic and read on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a bunch of GREAT tutorials on zeh web about today&#8217;s topic and they&#8217;re all very informative and instructive, but I&#8217;ve yet to see a comprehensive one when it comes to us, the amateur photographer that either doesn&#8217;t have the budget or doesn&#8217;t feel it justified to spend 500$ &#8211; 1500$ on a DSLR camera. So this article is for us, the cheapskates, the amateurs, the people that want to learn but without breaking the bank. Hear, hear!</p>
<p>A week ago I got back to Cluj from a very nice week long vacation back  in my home town. My girlfriend and I also decided to trek a bit on the very prominent landmark that is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceahl%C4%83u_Massif" target="_blank">Mount Ceahlau</a>. It&#8217;s 1907m above sea level at it&#8217;s highest and you can only get to the summit by foot, which is the way mountain climbing should be. You know, as in NOT with a car.</p>
<p>Anyway, the idea is we took a few pictures of the scenery and they were all nice and swell, even though we own a pretty old, low end, point-and-shoot camera. But as we reached the final stage of the track to the summit we got to a place that&#8217;s known as &#8220;Jgheabul cu Hotar&#8221; [a loose translation would be The Marked Ravine]. It&#8217;s a very nice portion of the track and a worthwhile climb there as one can see the highest peek above the plateau [Toaca, 1907m] and also the surrounding valley. So we thought, hey, what a good picture this would make! But as you can see below, the moment I tried to capture the sky, everything darkened. This is a normal and omnipresent problem with point-and-shoot cameras. Because their sensors are not as sensible to light as a professional camera you simply aren&#8217;t going to get that great picture.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-342" title="ceahlau_goodsky_badlight" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_goodsky_badlight.jpg" alt="ceahlau_goodsky_badlight" width="558" height="419" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">01</span></pre>
<p>Not in a single shot that is!</p>
<p>Because capturing more of the mountain and less of the sky meant the camera was able to adjust it&#8217;s light sensitivity and get all the nice details from the trees and rocks as you can see below. But not from the sky!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-343" title="ceahlau_badsky_goodscenery" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_badsky_goodscenery.jpg" alt="ceahlau_badsky_goodscenery" width="558" height="419" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">02</span></pre>
<p>This is where pre-processing ends. It&#8217;s about as much as you can do to ensure a good result at home. There are a few more tips on how to get ok-ish photos from your 99$ camera, but more on those in another tutorial.</p>
<p>Ok, so we have our two photos, one with a great sky but crappy landscape and the other with no sky and good scenery. Let&#8217;s start performing a bit of photographic surgery, shall we?</p>
<p><strong>! Note: click the pictures to see the large versions with all the details.</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-344" title="ceahlau_overlappedlayers" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_overlappedlayers-558x837.jpg" alt="ceahlau_overlappedlayers" width="558" height="837" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">03</span></pre>
<p>I overlapped the two photos, keeping the one with the good scenery in front and the one with the good sky in the back.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-345" title="ceahlau_overlappedlayers_properalignment" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_overlappedlayers_properalignment-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_overlappedlayers_properalignment" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<p>I know you might not understand much out of this one but what I did was I moved the top layer, the one with the good scenery and bad sky, higher so that it&#8217;s treeline was above the treeline of the layer beneath it. This is so that when I&#8217;ll be masking out the bad sky, all that remains underneath is the good sky and none of the old, dark scenery.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-346" title="ceahlau_masking" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_masking-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_masking" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">04</span></pre>
<blockquote><p>When you need to mask something out, take a large brush [I used 50px]  and do a rough masking out. It really saves time.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here&#8217;s something a lot of people don&#8217;t tell you: when you need to mask something out, take a large brush [I used 50px] and do a rough masking out. It saves time and if you zoom in a bit this can be a very good stress reliever. Just pound away with that mouse &#8217;till there&#8217;s nothing left! Then you can get to the detailed stuff.<br />
This is a technique I picked up from motion graphics and especially movie effects. It&#8217;s called making a Junk Matte and the guy I first heard this from a while back is <a href="http://leaders.creativecow.net/leaders/rabinowitz_aharon/" target="_blank">Aharon Rabinowitz</a>. Check out his awesome <a href="http://library.creativecow.net/tutorials/adobeaftereffects" target="_blank">After Effects tutorials</a> on <a href="http://library.creativecow.net/" target="_blank">Creative Cow</a>.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-347" title="ceahlau_proper" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_proper-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_proper" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">05</span></pre>
<p>As you can see this is now looking pretty good! Sure, the lighting is off and there&#8217;s a blue tint on the whole picture but the point is that is looks like ONE picture, not a comp[osition].</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s carry on and give this picture the quality it deserves.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-348" title="ceahlau_levels" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_levels-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_levels" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">06</span></pre>
<p>First things first: you can&#8217;t have quality output if your input is bad to start with, so let&#8217;s fix the all important lighting with a Levels Adjustment. Tightening the histogram of the image almost always is the most important step in any picture improvement.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-349" title="ceahlau_blueoff" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_blueoff-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_blueoff" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<p>There are many ways that blue tint could have been taken out but sometimes you have to try out a few until you like the result. For my picture I think a Color Balance with a -30 Blue set to Midtones works quite well.</p>
<p>Also, I liked the blue tint on the sky so I masked out the lower part of the sky on the Color Balance layer with a Black-White gradient.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-350" title="ceahlau_vignette" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_vignette-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_vignette" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">07</span></pre>
<p>Sometimes, with pictures like this, point-and-shoot cameras will get a vignette. Depending on your model it will be either a dark or light one. Our camera added a dark vignette in the top and top right side of the picture but it&#8217;s something easily solved by choosing a very soft, large white brush and clicking just a few times in that general area. Then, turn the opacity down to the point where it all looks uniform, like the cloud in our picture looks now.</p>
<p>This is something hard for beginners to notice so take a moment from editing and go do something else, then when you come back, put the picture in fullscreen mode and try to see if you can spot a vignette, but remember, it doesn&#8217;t always happen so don&#8217;t fix something that&#8217;s not broken.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-351" title="ceahlau_stefansmethod" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_stefansmethod-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_stefansmethod" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<pre><span class="number">08</span></pre>
<p>Using Stefan&#8217;s Sharpen method, of which I&#8217;ve talked about in the &#8220;<a href="http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/2009/tutorials/photo-manipulation-jump-for-joy/" target="_blank">Jump for Joy</a>&#8221; tutorial I cleared the picture of virtually all camera blur. Stefan&#8217;s method works particularly well with scenery photos and portraits so check that out!</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-355" title="ceahlau_final1" src="http://sickdesigner.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/ceahlau_final1-558x589.jpg" alt="ceahlau_final1" width="558" height="589" /></p>
<p>As for the final treatments I almost always like to play around with Blending Modes. What I did was I duplicated the picture and set it to Soft Light with 50% opacity. Then I added yet another duplicate of the picture and set it to screen to brighten things up a bit, but I masked out this layer with a gradient to prevent overburning the sky. Then I just lowered the saturation of the trees in the lower left side of the picture to keep everything below psychedelic levels and that&#8217;s it!</p>
<p><em class="end">I hope you enjoyed this tutorial. It&#8217;s always fun to do this sort of thing, especially knowing that the camera that took these pictures is &#8230; let&#8217;s just say less than capable. That&#8217;s it from me for now, but be sure to check out the next tutorial where I&#8217;ll be going over photo shooting techniques and tips for the ultra budget-aware!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sickdesigner.com/index.php/2009/photography/poor-mans-photo-enhancement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

